![]() ![]() Still, some viewers were convinced that the above-displayed footage had been doctored: "First let me say that I do not like anything about #45. In fact, Vanity Fair collected a series of photographs showing the seemingly ongoing battle between Donald Trump's hair and the wind. This isn't the first time that Trump's hair has been pushed into odd positions on film. Yet, these toupee truthers took to Twitter with a supposed damning piece of evidence in early February 2018 when a video purportedly showing the President's hair, or wig, getting tossed around in the wind was posted online: Nor does the intense focus on Trump's appearance speak particularly well of his critics. So far, Trump has not commented on the story or the legal threat.As president, this is probably the least important thing about him. “I don’t wear a toupee, it’s my hair, I swear. This is getting crazy,” said Trump last year at rally according to the Hill The website has defended itself adamantly claiming that “the absurdity of Harder’s threats should not distract from the underlying mission of the man who pays him: To intimidate Gawker and its reporters from publishing true things about public figures,” according to Gawker.Īs for Trump, he continues to say that his hair is real. Gawker has also insisted that their reporting was not based on one tipster but instead a slew of assertions, which include the site of Ivari International’s New York office, the 25th floor of Trump Tower, also the site of Donald Trump’s private office, and multiple advertisements placed by Ivari International in New York Magazine. This judgment also forced Gawker to file for bankruptcy and go up for sale according to USA Today. Thiel paid the bills for Hulk Hogan‘s lawyers in a lawsuit that led to a $140 million judgment against Gawker. Thiel has been involved in many lawsuits against Gawker after they outed his sexuality in a post back in 2007 according to Forbes. Gawker has denied the claim that this story was defamatory and considers it another disguised attack against the website from Silicon Valley Billionaire Peter Thiel. “ immediately provide us with the name and all contact information for the unnamed “tipster” of the story, so that we can serve that person with an immediate cease and desist letter to stop the spread of the false Story,” Harder wrote according to Gawker. Harder, in his letter, called the story “false and defamatory”, and deemed that it was an invasion of privacy of Ivari International, and said that the story caused unwarranted emotional distress according to Gawker. Harder, the lawyer for Ivari International, sent Gawker a letter asking the website to reveal its sources, take down the story from their website, and issue a public apology. However, not everyone was impressed with the article. Her article drew praise from a variety of news sources including the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, and the Atlantic. ![]() Gawker is in the middle of yet another legal mess. Last month, Gawker reporter, Ashley Feinberg, questioned whether Donald Trump‘s hair was, in her words, a”cotton candy hairspray labyrinth.” In her article, Feinberg drew connections between Trump and Ivari International, which specializes in $60,000 a piece hair extensions. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |